Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

Court of Protection Practice and Procedure Conference 2016

A comprehensive guide to best practice and current thinking

01 MAY 2012

COSTS: Lilleyman v Lilleyman (Costs) [2012] EWHC 1056 (Ch)

(Chancery Division; Briggs J; 26 April 2012)

 The claimant refused the defendants' offer which was more advantageous than the final award ordered. The claimant was entitled to her costs up to the date of the defendant's offer but defendant's claimed their costs plus interest from that date onwards. That result would leave the claimant with capital of £380,000, allowing for a Duxbury fund of £235,000, she would have a cushion of £145,000, a modest but not inadequate sum. That result would not be precluded by part 36.14(2) for being unjust.

The claimant ordered to pay 80% of defendants' costs after the date of the offer to account for the fact that they refused to accept the will failed to make reasonable provision throughout, they also initiated the exchange of a number of irrelevant considerations about conduct. Disparity in approach to costs in the Inheritance Act claims and financial proceedings which have the same underlying objective but the modern approach to Inheritance Act claims had the potential for very substantial costs shifting to the successful party.

Family Court Practice 2016, The

(Red Book)

Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
Red Book Plus

Red Book Plus

Family Court Essential Materials

This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...

Subscribe to our newsletters