All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
(Court of Appeal; Laws, Jacob and Wilson LJJ; 13 May 2011)
The wife was very wealthy (c £58.8m gross by date of trial; c £28.3m at date of separation) by virtue of pre-marriage inheritances. Nonetheless she lived extremely modestly throughout her 21 years of marriage. Recently the family was spending about £79,000 per annum.
Held that where the assets were entirely non-matrimonial and neither party had worked, the award to the husband of 9.3% of the assets (£5.3m) was not unacceptably discriminatory. The importance of the source of the assets may diminish over time depending on the circumstances, but here the assets had always been ring-fenced. ‘Special contribution' is a term of art which does not apply to a contribution of non-matrimonial property. The husband's appeal was dismissed. The judgment would be anonymised to protect the normality of the children's lives.
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of judicially approved case reports, covering all areas...