Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

09 JAN 2013

Turner v East Midlands Trains Ltd [2012] EWCA 1470; (2012) EMPLR 182

Termination of employment - employee's reputation

16 November 2012

Court of Appeal

Maurice Kay, Elias LJJ and Sir Stephen Sedley

Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights guarantees respect for private and family life. Action which damages a person's reputation or possibly (though the court was less sure of this) future job prospects or social relationships with colleagues could breach Article 8 and dismissal for misconduct could have that effect. However, Article 8 is not engaged where the damage to private and family life is caused by the conduct of the employee; and if the employee is found by a court, in civil or criminal proceedings, or by an employer in fair disciplinary proceedings, to be guilty of that conduct, then the employee will be treated as have been responsible for the damage to private and family life. So Article 8 will rarely be relevant to misconduct dismissals. Anyway, the standard ‘band of reasonable responses' test for unfair dismissal satisfies the safeguards and principles of Article 8.

The employers in this case concluded, by examining statistics demonstrating the number of invalid tickets issued by T when compared to other employees, that T was guilty of selling invalid tickets and keeping the proceeds. They therefore dismissed T. A tribunal held that this conclusion was within the band of reasonable responses and was fair. T appealed up to the Court of Appeal, arguing that a higher standard than the ‘band of reasonable responses' test was required where the reasons for dismissal would damage reputation and so engage Article 8.

The Court of Appeal held first that Article 8 did not apply where the employee, by his or her own conduct, was responsible for the reputation damage. That included cases where the employee had been found in the course of fair disciplinary proceedings to have committed the act complained of - so it all depended on the fairness of the disciplinary process. The band of reasonable responses test provided all the protection required to determine whether the process was fair and satisfied Article 8.

Social Media in the Workplace

A Handbook

This book is intended as a handbook for advisers to employers, providing an overview of the...

More Info from £58.50
Available in Company Law Online
Drafting Employment Documents for Expatriates

Drafting Employment Documents for Expatriates

Jordan Publishing Employment Law Series

Examines how employment documents can be used to help manage home and host country immigration,...

Subscribe to our newsletters