Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

Veale Wasborough Vizards , 26 JAN 2016

Taxing matters - how far does an employer's duty of care extend?

Taxing matters - how far does an employer's duty of care extend?
Charlotte Williams
Solicitor, Veale Wasbrough Vizards

A recent Pensions Ombudsman Determination decided that an employer had a duty of care to provide their employee with important information regarding tax implications in respect of their retirement benefits.


Mr Cherry worked as a police officer at the predecessor body to the Police and Crime Commissioner of South Wales (the Commissioner) from 1982, and was a member of the Police Pension Scheme. He retired in June 2011 and received his retirement benefits but was re-employed less than a month later in a role similar to his original role.

He later discovered this re-employment resulted in the loss of his 'protected pension age' and his pension payments were therefore 'unauthorised payments'. This meant they were subject to a tax charge.

Mr Cherry complained to the Ombudsman that the Commission should have informed him of the tax implications of taking the new position.

Whilst the Pensions Ombudsman agreed that the Commissioner was under no legal duty to provide advice to each employee about their tax liabilities, they had a duty of care to provide important information to Mr Cherry about the tax implications of re-employment in this situation; this did not amount to giving advice.

The Ombudsman directed the Commissioner to pay the amount due to HMRC arising from the loss of protection pension age only.

Best practice

The Ombudsman's determination may cause employers some concern regarding the scope of their duty of care to their employees. It is not clear how far the duty may extent, or how an employer might demonstrate that they have fulfilled it. Each decision turns on its own facts. Indeed, only last year a similar case found that the employer had no duty to warn an employee about the tax implications of electing to receive a major enhancement to his scheme benefits in view of a reduction in his annual allowance.

It is, however, clear that employers are not under a duty to give tax advice to employees and should avoid doing so.

In order to mitigate against a finding that they have breached their duty of care to an employee, employers should consider making relevant tax information available to employees, there this is appropriate. Employers could also ensure that the employee is advised to seek specialist advice before exercising rights or agreeing to significant changes, and could include a disclaimer or seek an indemnity from the employee where risks are identified.
Jordan Publishing Employment Law

Jordan Publishing Employment Law

"exceptional value for money in today's challenging legal environment" John Mitton, PG Legal

Available in Employment Law Online
EU & International Employment Law

EU & International Employment Law

"A very welcome addition to the very limited range of material available on domestic employment...

More Info £1,272.00
Available in Employment Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters