Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

13 SEP 2013

Shields Automotive v Langdon and Brolly UKEATS/0059/12; (2013) EMPLR 034

21 March 2013

Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)

Langstaff J, Miss J Gaskell and Mrs G Smith

TUPE requires employers to arrange for the election of employee representatives for the purposes of information and consultation about a TUPE transfer. The election must, so far as reasonably practicable, be fair. All affected employees are entitled to vote. If the employer does not comply with these rules, any affected employee may complain to an employment tribunal. The tribunal may award up to 13 weeks' pay.

The employer breached these rules in two ways. First, it arranged for the election of employee representatives at a time when B (one of the 18 employees affected) was not present, so he did not have an opportunity to vote. Secondly, the results for the second representative were tied. The employer then decided which of the two second placed candidates should be elected - whereas it should have allowed the employees to decide how the tie would be broken.

These were two technical minor breaches. The EAT awarded two weeks' pay each to the two complainants.

To view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).

To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu 

Jordan Publishing Employment Law

Jordan Publishing Employment Law

"exceptional value for money in today's challenging legal environment" John Mitton, PG Legal

Available in Lexis®Library
Social Media in the Workplace

Social Media in the Workplace

A Handbook

This book is intended as a handbook for advisers to employers, providing an overview of the...

Available in Lexis®Library