Nayif v The High Commission of Brunei  EWCA Civ 1521;  IRLR 134; (2015) EMPLR 021
Court of Appeal, Civil Division
The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Sir Brian Leveson, Elias and Rafferty LJJ
Normally, if someone brings a court or tribunal claim on the same subject matter as a previous claim, the later claim can be struck out on the basis either of ‘cause of action estoppel’ (ie the claim has already been determined) or ‘issue estoppel’ (ie a question of fact has already been determined which would defeat the subsequent claim). This case shows that no question of either type of estoppel arises where a claim is dismissed by a tribunal because it is out of time.
N’s complaints of race discrimination were brought outside the three month time limit. The tribunal concluded there were no grounds which made it just and equitable to extend the time limit, so the claims were dismissed. N subsequently brought claims in the High Court for negligence relying on the same facts. The employer argued the claims should be struck out because they had already been determined. The Court of Appeal disagreed: the tribunal had never determined the merits of the claims. The only matter it had determined was that the complaints were made too late.
Jordan Publishing Employment Law Series
Examines how employment documents can be used to help manage home and host country immigration,...