Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

02 NOV 2012

Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers) Limited v Tattersall UKEAT/0605/11/SM; (2012) EMPLR 153

Termination of employment - unfair judgment - objectivity

17 May 2012

Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)

Master of the Rolls, Baroness Drake of Shene and Mrs A Gallico

The fact that redundancy selection criteria involve an element of judgment does not mean that they are ‘wholly subjective' and therefore unfair.

T was made redundant from his position as Property Manager of a brewery, due to the company's adverse trading position. He was one of five senior managers. He was selected because the company considered his position could be lost with the least detrimental effect on the business and his job could be most easily absorbed by others. A tribunal concluded his dismissal was unfair because, among other things, the criteria for selection were wholly subjective and the company had not given proper consideration to whether any of the other senior managers could have been made redundant instead. The tribunal considered that there was nevertheless a 20% chance that, had the company acted fairly, he would still have been selected for redundancy.

Social Media in the Workplace

Social Media in the Workplace

A Handbook

This book is intended as a handbook for advisers to employers, providing an overview of the...

Available in Lexis®Library
Jordan Publishing Employment Law

Jordan Publishing Employment Law

"exceptional value for money in today's challenging legal environment" John Mitton, PG Legal

Available in Lexis®Library