Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

05 OCT 2012

Manchester College v Hazel UKEAT/0642/RN (2012) EMPLR 144

Dismissals and re-engagement

9 July 2012

Employment Appeal Tribunal

HHJ McMullen QC

Dismissals and re-engagement following a TUPE transfer in order to harmonise terms and conditions of employment are automatically unfair; and the remedy could be re-engagement on the original terms of employment, even if the employees have accepted the new terms.

The College successfully bid for Offender Learning Contracts from the Learning and Skills Council. On discovering costs they had not previously appreciated, they sought to save costs by harmonizing terms and conditions of employment. The employees did not agree, so they were dismissed and offered re-engagement on revised terms. The employees accepted the new terms but brought proceedings for unfair dismissal.

The reason for the dismissal was connected with the transfer. It was not for an ‘economic, technical or organizational reason entailing changes in the workforce'. The dismissals were therefore automatically unfair. The tribunal, upheld by the EAT, ordered re-engagement on the original terms.

To view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).

To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu

Law of Termination of Employment, The

Law of Termination of Employment, The

Authoritative analysis of the rules governing termination of employment provides coverage of the...



Law and Practice

The status of employment rights on the transfer of an undertaking is an extremely complex area of...

Available in Employment Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters