All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
17 and 18 April 2013
Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)
If an ‘unless order' (ie an order that unless a party to proceedings complies with a tribunal's order, the claim or response will be struck out) is not complied with, the claim or response is struck out without the need for a further order.
J alleged constructive dismissal, sex discrimination, disability discrimination and whistle-blowing. The claim, though lengthy (160 pages) was in general terms with no specifics of what J was complaining about. She was ordered to prepare a schedule giving details. Insufficient particulars were provided so an unless order was made. Again, insufficient particulars were provided and the claim was struck out.
J applied for ‘relief from sanction' which was granted and a further unless order was made. After further particulars were provided, the judge concluded that there was substantial compliance with the order and the claim was allowed to proceed. But J was still ordered to revise and clarify the schedule.
The council argued on appeal that the claim should have been struck out. The fact that the tribunal made a further order showed that there had not been substantial compliance. The EAT agreed and the claim was therefore struck out. It was still open to J to apply for relief from sanction and apply to have the claim reinstated, so long as the particulars ordered by the tribunal were now provided.
To view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu
Examines how employment documents can be used to help manage home and host country immigration,...