Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

13 SEP 2013

Imam-Sadeque v Bluebay Asset Management (Services) Ltd [2013] IRLR 344; (2013) EMPLR 025

10 December 2012

Queen's Bench Division

Popplewell J

Employees owe a duty to their employers not to do anything to damage the interests of their employers. Assisting in setting up a business which competes with one's employer and assisting that business to recruit an employee of one's employer breach that duty.

IS wanted to leave his employers, BAMSL, but did not want to resign as he would then be treated, under a bonus scheme, as a ‘bad leaver' and would lose his rights under that scheme to any bonus which would vest after his employment ended. Terms of his departure were therefore agreed in a compromise agreement whereby he would be placed on ‘garden leave' for the last few months of is employment and would qualify for the fund units under the bonus scheme so long as he complied with the terms of the compromise agreement and his contract of employment.

While on garden leave, he met with a former employee of BAMSL and assisted her in setting up a competing business. For example, he helped to draft a press release for the new business. He also helped the new business to recruit one of BAMSL's employees. When BAMSL found out, it refused to give him the fund units.

IS sued BAMSL, arguing first that he had not breached his contract; or that if he had, the contractual clause permitting forfeiture of his bonus rights amounted to a penalty clause and was therefore unenforceable.

The High Court held that assisting in the start-up of a competitor and assisting in the recruitment breached the duty of fidelity and the express terms of his contract. The forfeiture of his bonus was not a penalty, it was a consequence of his being a ‘bad leaver' within the terms of the bonus scheme and in any case the amount forfeited was not excessive in view of the breach. His claim for the bonus therefore failed

To view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).

To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu

Law of Termination of Employment, The

Authoritative analysis of the rules governing termination of employment provides coverage of the...

More Info from £110.00

Social Media in the Workplace

A Handbook

This book is intended as a handbook for advisers to employers, providing an overview of the...

More Info from £65.00
Available in Company Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters