LexisLibrary and LexisPSL
Sign up for a free trial today and get full access for a weekTrial
19 July 2012
Employment Appeal Tribunal
HHJ Peter Clark
Tribunals should disregard evidence given about ‘without prejudice discussions' unless both parties have clearly agreed that that evidence can be referred to.
G was found to have been unfairly dismissed. In response to a question from the tribunal, one of the council's witnesses mentioned there had been discussions prior to dismissal about a possible settlement agreement. The tribunal held, in view of that evidence, that if G had not been dismissed, there was a 50% chance he would have entered a settlement agreement. It concluded that compensation should be significantly reduced. The EAT overruled the tribunal, holding that the tribunal should not have taken the without prejudice discussions into account.
To view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu
"exceptional value for money in today's challenging legal environment" John Mitton, PG Legal