All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
31 January 2012
Court of Appeal
Pill LJ, Elias LJ
F was aged 78. He was laid off without pay. He objected. He was then dismissed by reason of retirement. He brought a tribunal claim while still employed for a redundancy payment by reason of lay off under s135(1) ERA 1996. He later brought an unfair dismissal claim both under s98 (the normal requirement of reasonableness) and for asserting statutory right to a redundancy payment, non-payment of wages and failure to provide statement of terms of employment. The employer applied to have the second proceedings struck out because of ‘res judicata' or ‘issue estoppel'(ie that the issue had already been determined in the earlier proceedings) or as abuse of process under Henderson rule (ie that it is an abuse of process to bring a claim which could have been brought in earlier proceedings).
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu.
Examines how employment documents can be used to help manage home and host country immigration,...