All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
18 May 2012
Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)
Wilkie J, Mrs C Baelz and Mr R Lyons
An allowance paid to employees for agreeing to be ‘on-call' did not breach the equal pay legislation even though only men received it. It was explained by a material factor - the need to encourage employees to agree to be on-call. That was a legitimate aim and the payment of the allowance was a proportionate way of achieving it.
To view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu
This book is intended as a handbook for advisers to employers, providing an overview of the...