Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof  UKSC 32; (2014) EMPLR 057
Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath
Members of Limited Liability Partnerships are ‘workers’ for the purposes of the employment legislation.
B became a member of C LLP. She received a fixed annual share of the profits and profit sharing units determined by the board. She disclosed to C LLP’s money laundering officers that the managing partner of a Tanzanian law firm (with whom C LPP had a joint venture) had paid bribes to secure work and the outcome of cases. She claimed that these were protected disclosures under the whistle-blowing legislation and that she was subjected to detriments as a result, including suspension, allegations of misconduct and ultimately expelling her from the partnership.
The question was whether she was a ‘worker’ for the purposes of the whistle-blowing legislation. Section 4(4) of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 provides that members of an LLP are not to be regarded for any purposes as employed unless, ‘if [he] and other members were partners in a partnership, [he] would be regarded as employed by the partnership.’ Previous case-law established that partners cannot be employees because they are all in a contractual relationship with one another so a partner ‘would be both workman and employer, which is a legal impossibility’. But previous case-law has not dealt with the question of whether partners can be ‘workers’, for which the definition is someone who works under a contract to perform personally any work or services for another party to the contract, other than for a client or customer of a profession or business undertaking.
The Supreme Court held that B had contracted with the limited partnership to perform work personally and so was a ‘worker’. Section 4(4) of the 2000 Act did not change that.
Comment: This has wider consequences than just for the whistle-blowing legislation. ‘Workers’ have various rights and employers of workers have various obligations. For example, employers may have to consider ‘auto-enrolment’ into pension schemes for members of an LLP.
"exceptional value for money in today's challenging legal environment" John Mitton, PG Legal