Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

26 FEB 2016

Bone v North Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2016] EWCA Civ 45; (2016) EMPLR 015

Bone v North Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2016] EWCA Civ 45; (2016) EMPLR 015
1 February 2016

Court of Appeal

Laws, Floyd and Bean LJJ


The Court of Appeal has held that an employment tribunal was entitled to conclude that an employer’s failure to intervene in a dispute between two trade unions and to deal with personal insults between representatives amounted to imposing a detriment because of trade union activities.

B was a representative of WEU, an independent union. B had stood in the general election in 2010 as a candidate for the ‘English Democrats Party’, regarded by some as a right-wing party to which some BNP members had defected. UNISON representatives insulted the WEA, calling it ‘crypto fascist’ and asserting links with the BNP; and also insulted B by calling him ‘Adolf’ and saying he was a ‘bigot’. Applying its policy to remain neutral in disputes between unions, the Trust took no action over these insults. B made numerous complaints to a tribunal, including that the Trust, by taking no action, subjected him to a detriment to deter him from or penalise him for taking part in WEU’s activities.

The employment tribunal rejected most of B’s claims; but upheld those concerned with the insults referred to above. The EAT held that even those claims should not have succeeded because the employer’s motivation was only to remain neutral in union disputes.

The Court of Appeal restored the tribunal’s decision. It concluded that the tribunal was entitled to conclude that the Trust’s failure to deal with the insults, for example by taking disciplinary action against those who described the WEA as ‘fascist’ and B as a ‘bigot’, amounted to a detriment imposed for the purpose of preventing or deterring him from taking part in WEA’s activities.

Law of Termination of Employment, The

Authoritative analysis of the rules governing termination of employment provides coverage of the...

More Info from £118.00
Jordan Publishing Employment Law

Jordan Publishing Employment Law

"exceptional value for money in today's challenging legal environment" John Mitton, PG Legal

Available in Employment Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters