Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Employment Law

Legal guidance - compliance - software

02 NOV 2012

AQ Limited v Holden UKEAT/0021/12/CEA; (2012) EMPLR 154

Employment tribunal - costs - self representing litigant

16 April 2012

Employment Appeal Tribunal

HHJ David Richardson, Mr M Clancy and Mr M Worthington

The fact that a claimant is not professionally represented in a tribunal is a (not conclusive) factor against the tribunal making an award of costs against the Claimant; as is the fact that the Respondent did not apply for a pre-hearing review to have the claim struck out or for a deposit.

H's complaint of constructive dismissal before an employment tribunal failed. The tribunal refused AQ's application for costs. AQ appealed, arguing that the tribunal had wrongly taken account of the fact that H was representing himself and that AQ had not applied for a pre-hearing review. The EAT dismissed the appeal, saying the tribunal was entitled to take those factors into account.

Jordan Publishing Employment Law

Jordan Publishing Employment Law

"exceptional value for money in today's challenging legal environment" John Mitton, PG Legal

Available in Employment Law Online


Law and Practice

The status of employment rights on the transfer of an undertaking is an extremely complex area of...

More Info from £76.50
Available in Employment Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters