Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Competition Law

Analysis - debate - current awareness

24 MAY 2016

Interim Measures Versus Commitment Decisions in Fast-developing Markets

Interim Measures Versus Commitment Decisions in Fast-developing Markets

By Lukas Solek

The practice of the European Commission to adopt commitment decisions in cases related to fast-developing markets appears to be somewhat ineffective considering the time delay and paucity of precedent. At first glance, interim measures seem to offer a solution for both issues. However, the law and practice of interim measures show that the limitation of protected interests as well as heavy procedural framework deter the European Commission from awarding interim measures in relation to competition cases. Thus, the Commission prefers to resolve urgent threats to competition by accepting commitments offered by the undertakings concerned. Against this backdrop, this article examines the shortcomings of the present regime of commitment decisions and interim measures in the context of fast-developing markets and presents possible solutions.


The full version of this  article appears in the 2016 issue 1 of Competition Law Journal

Online subscribers can access  the article here.

For details on how you can subscribe to Competition Law or any other titles, please contact a member of our  sales team: Tel 0117 917 5100, or email: editor@jordanpublishing.co.uk



UK Competition Law Reports

UK Competition Law Reports

A comprehensive service bringing together the case-law of the Competition Appeal Tribunal

More Info from £166.00
Available in Competition Law Online
Competition Law Journal

Competition Law Journal

Provides all competition law advisers with a reliable source of analysis on law and practice in...

Available in Competition Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters