Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Company Law

Analysis - guidance - compliance

20 DEC 2013


Queen's Bench Division

Popplewell J

18 October 2013

(1) Introduction

The court considered whether or not the company's directors had breached a number of their fiduciary duties.     

[1]        On 29 June 2009, Bernard Madoff was sentenced by a Court of the Southern District of New York to 150 years in prison and ordered to forfeit US$170 billion.  The present claim is brought in the long shadow cast by his notorious Ponzi scheme fraud, perpetrated through his New York business for two decades or more.  But this case is not primarily about the Ponzi scheme.  None of the remaining Defendants knew of, or suspected, the fraud.  It is not suggested that they did, nor that they should have done.  Many lost their own savings as a result of the scheme.  All have had their lives turned upside down.  They are all victims of Bernard Madoff's fraud.

(1)     the payments constituted an unlawful distribution of capital to MSIL's shareholder, Bernard Madoff; and/or

(2)     the director was in breach of the duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which such powers are conferred; and/or

(3)     the director was in breach of the duty to act in the way he considers in good faith to be in the best interests of the company; and/or

(4)     the director was in breach of the duty to exercise reasonable care skill and diligence.

To read the full transcript of this case and the bulletin commenary log-in to Gore-Browne online.



Corporate Borrowing

Law and Practice

The authority on corporate borrowing

More Info from £124.00
Available in Company Law Online

Trade Marks

Law and Practice

A concise account of UK trade marks law within the European and international context.

More Info from £80.00
Available in Commercial Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters